MultiCam Ready To Replace UCP

Last Friday, the Army announced that this summer it will begin fielding uniforms with a new camouflage pattern to all its troops serving in Afghanistan.

According to a statement obtained by Military.com, Army Secretary John McHugh decided that the so-called "MultiCam" pattern developed by New York-based Crye Precision is the most effective camouflage in the varied terrain of Afghanistan's forests, deserts, mountains and rural villages.

"This decision … reflects the Army's commitment to giving Soldiers in Afghanistan the most effective concealment possible," the statement said. "Camouflage alternatives represent one facet of the Army's ongoing efforts to improve the Army Combat Uniform."

The decision comes four months after the service relented to pressure from then-chairman of the House Appropriations Committee's defense panel, the late Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who ordered the Army to study whether its current Universal Camouflage Pattern was the best scheme for Afghan operations.

At the time, Murtha recounted comments he'd received from Army noncommissioned officers complaining about the UCP's colors and their inability to meld into Afghanistan's rural backgrounds.

MultiCam had long been a favorite of Army Special Operations forces, including Rangers and Green Berets, and had also been fielded in limited numbers to Air Force special operations Airmen.

Army officials launched a program in September to determine whether the UCP was adequate for Afghanistan and fielded a limited number of uniforms patterned in MultiCam and so-called "UCP-Delta," which was developed by the Army Soldier Systems Center in Natick, Mass. The 2nd Battalion of the 12th Infantry Regiment received an entire suite of gear in MultiCam, with the 3rd Squadron of the 61st Cavalry Regiment getting the UCP-D ensemble.

The Army will begin issuing the MultiCam "fire-resistant Army Combat Uniform" to troops deploying to Afghanistan this summer before shipping them to troops already there who are still wearing UCP, said Army spokesman Lt. Col. Jimmie Cummings. The Army has nearly 48,000 troops deployed to Afghanistan.

Joes will receive a full set of combat uniforms, including combat shirt, plate carriers, packs, pouches and helmet covers in MultiCam.

In November, officials from PEO Soldier, the Army's Asymmetric Warfare Group, and Special Operations Command tested a variety of patterns against a number of backgrounds in Afghanistan. The patterns included AOR-II, a SEAL-developed pattern similar to the Marine Corps' woodland digital; UCP-D; MultiCam; UCP; the Natick-designed Desert Brush camo and Mirage, which was developed by Bulldog Tactical, a civilian company.

"The results, along with surveys of Soldiers in the two battalions who received alternate camouflage, formed the basis for the Army's decision on MultiCam," the Army said.

The Army's MultiCam pick is part of a recent string of victories for the specialty design company which recently won a competition to revamp the British military's 40 year-old woodland Disruptive Pattern Material camo scheme.

The study on Afghan camo patterns will feed into an overall re-look at the Army's UCP choice and help determine whether the service should jettison the unpopular camo after less than five years in service.

For more visit Military.com, or check out Christian Lowe's article, Army Picks New Camo for Afghanistan Units, February 19th, 2010.

It's Phishing Season

The "white hat" hackers at Intrepidus, a New York-based information security service provider, recently tested 2400 employees at two of its clients with a "tax refund" scenario phishing email. The clients were a state agency and a small bank. This test got interesting, says Rohyt Belani, CEO of Intrepidus, when an average of 35 percent of the employees clicked on the email to find out what the tax refund email contained.

"That is a big foothold for a hacker," Belani says. "Just imagine that over one-third of your employees (or customers) clicked on a link that could potentially infect their PC and your network."

The good news says Belani, is that it was only a test. The bad news, unfortunately, is that these kinds of phishing attacks can and do happen to any business or individual consumer.

Here are some other scams for employees and customers to avoid:

Anything Claiming to be from the IRS -- Despite the flood of messages purportedly from the agency, the IRS doesn't discuss tax account matters via email. It also doesn't initiate taxpayer contact via unsolicited email or ask for personal identifying or financial information. Taxpayers do not have to complete a "special form" to obtain a refund.

Social Security Alerts -- Another phony email claims to be from the Social Security Administration (SSA), threatening that if the person doesn't update their account information (on a bogus site) they will not receive a cost-of-living increase. Now, consumers may receive official letters from SSA attempting to verify that their address or bank has changed, or that they have become ineligible for benefits. Such letters are likely to be legitimate if they do not request information. But it's always best to verify communications by calling SSA: (800-772-1213).

FBI Windfalls -- Earlier this month, the Federal Bureau of Investigation warned Hawaii residents to not fall for emails that claimed to be from the bureau. The phishing emails include FBI letterhead, seal and banners with the FBI Director's photos to make them appear genuine. The notes claimed that the recipient had inherited money, or others claimed that the FBI was imposing fines through email -- which isn't done. The FBI says they have received a large number of complaints, leading investigators to believe that hundreds or even thousands of residents received the emails.

Oh, and where do you think the emails originated?

Nigeria.

To look deeper into the world of phishing, visit GovInfo Security.